 Your new post is loading...
We all know someone who loves to talk politics but sounds like a jerk every time they do. Talking about politics may be taboo for many of us but it doesn't have to be.
Ever wonder why it is that Fox News can lie over and over again - yet continue to call itself "News"? It's because Fox News is a corporation - and ever since...
NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. -- Former Florida Gov.''Every time I hear that "because National Security" excuse, what I really hear is "normally docile taxpayers and voters would be outraged to the point of revolutionary activity if they actually understood how their taxes and votes were being applied."
James McAvoy unleashes his evil side in ‘Macbeth.’ He talks to Abby Haglage about the painful experience.
I wanted to take a moment to follow up on a post I recently wrote on James O'Keefe III and the ACORN scandal.
In a somewhat related story, CBS has reporteddetails about that notorious secret recording of Mitt Romney last year. The controversial video became known as the "47%" speech. One comment caught my eye. Why, the commenter writes, is what the bartender did any different to what O'Keefe did? Both apparently violated the Invasion of Privacy laws, which states it is illegal to record anybody without their persmission. It's a valid question so I thought I would look into the issue.
The U.S. housing market is still a ward of the state. Almost all new mortgages — $1.6 trillion last year alone — are guaranteed by taxpayer dollars.
The purpose of the media, the press, is to be the unbiased source of information for the citizens. Americans would never accept government controlled media, for they would be assured that government would have no entity to police it.
Her plan would leave the country with a $566 billion shortfall after 10 years.
Enlarge IT WAS bound to be a messy combination and, according to a new report on censorship in China, it is. The country has an estimated 600m internet users who are...
Excerpt from Editorial from the NY Times
...Mr. Obama should have no illusions about the core beliefs of some of his Republican dining partners, or their willingness to accept change. That was made clear on Tuesday when the House Budget Committee chairman, Representative Paul Ryan, unveiled his 2014 spending plan: a retread of ideas that voters soundly rejected, made even worse, if possible, by sharper cuts to vital services and more dishonest tax provisions. The budget, which will surely fly through the House, was quickly praised as “serious” and job-creating by the Senate Republican leader, Mitch McConnell, though it is neither. By cutting $4.6 trillion from spending over the next decade, it would reverse the country’s nascent economic growth, kill millions of real and potential jobs, and deprive those suffering the most of social assistance.
All the tired ideas from 2011 and 2012 are back: eliminating Medicare’s guarantee to retirees by turning it into a voucher plan; dispensing with Medicaid and food stamps by turning them into block grants for states to cut freely; repealing most of the reforms to health care and Wall Street; shrinking beyond recognition the federal role in education, job training, transportation and scientific and medical research. The public opinion of these callous proposals was made clear in the fall election, but Mr. Ryan is too ideologically fervid to have learned that lesson. The 2014 budget is even worse than that of the previous two years because it attempts to balance the budget in 10 years instead of the previous 20 or more. That would take nondefense discretionary spending down to nearly 2 percent of the economy, the lowest in modern history. And in its laziest section, it sets a goal of slashing the top tax rate for the rich to 25 percent from 39.6 percent, though naturally Mr. Ryan doesn’t explain how this could happen without raising taxes on middle- and lower-income people. (Sound familiar?)
There’s no need, of course, to balance the budget in 10 years or even 20; these dates are arbitrary, designed solely to impress the extreme fiscal conservatives who now compose the core of the Republican Party.
Did you know HSBC bank helped Al Qaeda launder money? Watch Sen. Warren demand accountability -- and then sign the petition telling the SEC to end "too big for trial."
It’s time for one of our annual political rituals — CPAC, the American Conservative Union’s conference, begins this Wednesday.
|
Stephane Hessel's ideas are lived on by Europe's new, fringe political parties. Will they stain or sustain his legacy?
By Lisa Gilbert and Kelly Ngo “There are moments in our lives when we have an opportunity to ignite tremendous positive change—not just in the lives of the customers and communities we serve every day, but in our country.” Those … Continue reading...
By Sen. Matt Smith, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette Op-Ed
The Pennsylvania Legislature has more important issues to focus on than an unnecessary and misguided proposal masquerading as Electoral College reform. Senate Bill 538 should be rejected by Republicans and Democrats alike. ...
S.B. 538 would change the commonwealth's current "winner-take-all" presidential election system to one in which 18 of Pennsylvania's 20 electoral votes would be distributed proportionally based on the presidential candidate vote count. The final two votes would be awarded to the overall state election winner. ...
As Democratic chair of the Senate State Government Committee, I intend to work in Harrisburg with both Democrats and Republicans to advance ideas to increase voter participation. Several initiatives before the committee would do this. These commonsense measures include allowing individuals to register online up to 30 days before an election, allowing voters to register on Election Day and vote at certain locations before Election Day (i.e., early voting) and voting by absentee ballot without being required to provide a specified reason.
Rather than dealing with maneuvers aimed at tilting election results in one party's favor, the Legislature should take action to restore the public's faith in our electoral system. To that end, comprehensive campaign finance reform and mandatory online filing of campaign reports are goals we should pursue.
Rather than ramming a partisan electoral scheme through the Legislature, both sides should work together to increase voter access, confidence and participation. The last thing we should be doing is changing the rules of the game to benefit one team. Let's make sure the rules benefit all Pennsylvanians. Read more.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Ted Deutch (D-Fla.) introduced a constitutional amendment on Tuesday, aimed at reversing the Supreme Court's ruling on Citizens United.
Excerpt from analysis by EZRA KLEIN, Washington Post
Future deficits are a legitimate concern. But as either Yogi Berra or Niels Bohr said, predictions are very difficult, especially about the future. And future deficits are, annoyingly, situated entirely in the future. So most everyone in Washington has outsourced the difficult task of estimating future deficits to the genial and diligent wonks at the Congressional Budget Office. The CBO has come back with two projections. One is a simple, mechanical projection of future deficits based on current law. Everyone pretty much ignores this analysis, because, in recent years, current law has been a poor predictor of future policy. The law said, for instance, that all the Bush tax cuts would expire at the end of 2012 and that huge Medicare cuts would be imposed. Everyone knew that Congress wouldn’t let that happen, and that the current-law projection was wrong. Recognizing this, the CBO constructed another projection it calls the “alternative fiscal scenario.” A better name might be the “Washington is incredibly irresponsible” scenario. Under this model, all of President George W. Bush’s tax cuts are extended, the automatic budget cuts known as sequestration neither happen nor are replaced by other cuts, the cost controls in Obama’s Affordable Care Act are repealed, spending on Iraq and Afghanistan continues indefinitely, and so forth.
Policy makers, pundits and others almost exclusively use this model to stoke Washington’s deficit anxieties. This model, too, is wrong. Although most of the Bush tax cuts were extended permanently, some weren’t — producing more than $600 billion in revenue over 10 years. Likewise, sequestration’s budget cuts have actually begun, and the costly wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are ending. At the left-leaning Center for American Progress, Michael Linden pulled together an illuminating analysis of exactly what assumptions lurk behind the alternative fiscal scenario’s odd projections. [MORE]
Senators Kerry, Harkin, and Levin all decried the state of campaign finance in retiring remarks. (Retiring senators Carl Levin, John Kerry, & Tom Harkin all agree: money is ruining the Senate.
At a Senate Banking Committee hearing on Thursday, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) rebuked Republicans for blocking Richard Cordray’s confirmation as director of her brainchild, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
An influential senator who has sought to place a moratorium on new Internet cafes said Wednesday that criminal allegations of racketeering and other wrongdoing in the industry should spur lawmakers to close the storefront businesses.
Jeanene Louden and co-host Debilyn Molineaux discuss current affairs and systemic changes that are needed in the Unitied States. Live callers are encouraged to propose their own solutions and engage with the host and/or guests.
by JAKE MILLER, CBS News
The man who recorded Romney's "47 percent" comments at a fundraiser in Florida - comments that ransacked Romney's presidential bid after they were publicized last September - was a bartender for the catering company serving the event, and he credits former President Bill Clinton for his decision to bring a camera to work that fateful day. The Huffington Post reports that the company for which the yet-to-be-named bartender worked had previously catered an event where Mr. Clinton spoke. When the former president was done with his remarks, he stepped into the kitchen to thank the staff - waiters, bartenders, busboys - who had helped put the event together. The bartender decided to bring his camera to the Romney fundraiser, hoping he could get a photo with Romney if the GOP candidate followed Mr. Clinton's lead.
Romney did not emulate the garrulous former president. Instead, he arrived late to the event, spoke briefly, and was rushed out. He told his dinner guests that his remarks were off the record, but he did not repeat the warning to the catering staff.
The bartender would not get a picture with Romney as he'd hoped. Instead, he set his camera on the bar and surreptitiously recorded Romney's remarks. [MORE]
by CARL GIBSON, Huffington Post
Here's a pop quiz for Congress: If you cut food assistance for needy families by $333 million, and allow corporations to dodge $183 billion in federal taxes in the same year, how much did you end up reducing the deficit? We just saw the first round of $85 billion in sequester cuts, now coupled with the injustice of the top 5 "too-big-to-fail" banks -- Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, Wells Fargo and Goldman Sachs -- receiving an annual subsidy of $63 billion. The next five biggest banks receive a $20 billion annual subsidy. This still continues even though we just allowed sequestration to cut $333 million from the supplemental nutrition program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC). We're spending billions to keep big banks afloat, but we just cut 600,000 needy mothers and their children from the WIC program. This government has decided it would rather starve children than take big banks off the welfare rolls. [NEWS]
Excerpt from article by by Thomas C. Hall, Washington Business Journal
"One of the think-tank's former clients, RJR Nabisco Inc., sought Campanella's advice on environmental issues. Then Monsanto Corp., General Electric Co., Amoco Corp. and other big-names came calling; Stateside now has more than 80 clients. "In the middle of these projects, I started asking why these big companies needed help with issue expertise," Campanella said. After discussing it with a few former clients who became her unofficial board of directors, Stateside was launched with about $81,000 in startup cash. Even though the niche was clearly there, the company was plowing new turf, and it wasn't sure how to grow.
"We were so opportunistic we didn't do much planning," she acknowledged."
When the light bulb went on, Campanella was well prepared. She had been immersed in legislative issues for more than a decade already, serving on the staffs of former Reps. Jack Kemp, R-N.Y., and Mickey Edwards, R-Okla., before a brief stint at the Department of Transportation in the Reagan administration.
|
Some very common sense practical advice on talking politics. I particularly like, "finding flaws in your own position", It can help strengthen it and lets you empathize to become more flexable in discussions. I also find the fact check sources quite useful. Over all this is an excellent way to have an an informative and productive dialogue on issues.